data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06f2b/06f2b1254f03337714b29c83dcc991dbb5868740" alt="Mullvad vpn wireguard"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db0fa/db0faf4733a803a7524d771b1ca67a979fdd7ced" alt="mullvad vpn wireguard mullvad vpn wireguard"
I just haven’t been able to traffic data over my mullvad connection. I have a wireguard roadwarrior working well, as is everything else. I haven’t had any other problems with this config, though, whether using pppoe0 or eth1 directly as my WAN interface. Occasionally I have been testing functionality direct to the internet, when I switch to the pppoe0 connection to my ISP (hardening some of the rules as I do). The reason I have both eth1 and pppoe0 as my WAN interface in the config is that I’m prototyping it on my existing network. But regardless, shouldn’t I still be able to ping or do some other kind of test to get data over that interface, regardless of routing?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f9f6/1f9f68685b04452c71c1328a23b798e50c936bd3" alt="mullvad vpn wireguard mullvad vpn wireguard"
I’m new to zone-policy and PBR though, so I’m not sure if it’s meant to. Regardless of routing, should I still just be able to ping over that interface (ping -I wg1 1.1.1.1) and get a response?Īs you can see in my configuration below, I’m trying to route a specific network group via the VPN, but the route doesn’t appear in the routing table. Hi all, I’m trying to set up a connection to Mullvad using 1.4-rolling-202111200317, and the connection is up and handshaking, but I can’t send any data over it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06f2b/06f2b1254f03337714b29c83dcc991dbb5868740" alt="Mullvad vpn wireguard"